Taktik 2025
Welome to Taktik 2025's team-based robotic competition. In 2 vs 2 matchups, participating teams will have a five-minute time limit to use the radio-controlled robots they designed, built and programmed to score as many points as possible. To score points, torus-shaped game pieces will have to be picked-up and placed or thrown on different stations. In this competition, robots efficiency will be just as important as the team's choices, since multipliers will significantly boost teams that capture the right combination of stations. At the center of the playing field will be the central post where a single game piece could be worth up to 500 points !
Student & teachers
Hours of work
Parts
Cups of coffee
Members
Captain
Design Captain
Programming Captain
Co-Captain
Co-Captain
Team member
Team member
Team member
Team member
Team member
Graphics & web
Teacher
Teacher
Teacher
Teacher
Teacher
Teacher
Teacher
Teacher
You can see some of our hand-drawn sketches for our robot design.
Main design features:
After humans left earth, our Dall-e builds his home from a junk spaceship like the rest of the robots left behind in this Industrial automated world ...
He arranges his collection of disks, allocating them one at a time.
In this new episode of Chausette News, your favorite show hosts, Brad and Brad, discover the amazing world of robotic competition.
In this video, I’ll walk you through the algorithm I developed for the CRC competition 4th preliminary coding challenge. I'll explain the key steps and logic behind the solution, as well as how I optimized performance to meet the challenge requirements.
Challenges faced by the team and how we overcame them
Different levels of experience between group members affected confidence, clarity of communication and thus, overall efficiency. We all needed to be confident in our strengths, whatever they were, to actually share the workload effectively. We ultimately assigned tasks to small groups of members entrusted to make decisions independently and shared leadership responsibilities.
Availability of team members varied, making it initially difficult to delegate tasks. We decided to add an extra day to our meeting schedule and assign specific days to specific members for consistency.
Managing individual and group expectations was another issue we dealt with. To strike a balance between the two, we had to be unafraid to be more realistic and direct when negotiating problems.
We did not measure the final width of our first prototype from wheel to wheel, and found that the frame was too wide after assembly. We had to trim one side of the frame and remount the wheels on the new base.
To keep the number of power motors down we had to come up with a non-motorized friction and force reliant grabbing mechanism.
Gallery
